top of page
_700x300 v3.png

Automate Your Research Workflows Using AI Agents for Scientific Discovery

Is the next major scientific breakthrough hiding in plain sight, buried under mountains of research papers? AI agents built to read every paper in your field and suggest the next experiment are no longer a moonshot. FutureHouse, a San Francisco nonprofit with backing from former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, believes artificial intelligence can help us find out faster. FutureHouse has opened a web platform and API offering: a set of four specialized AI-powered tools, or AI agents, which they call "AI scientists," designed to help and speed up the often-grinding work of scientific investigation.


Released on May 1, the AI scientist agents promise to speed up literature review, precedent checks, and even early-stage chemistry design, all from a single dashboard. The platform gives scientists incredibly smart assistants that can filter through data, connect dots, and even propose new ideas at a pace that humans simply can't match.


FutureHouse has an ambitious goal: to develop what they call an "AI scientist" within the next decade. While that ultimate goal is still on the horizon, their newly launched platform and API (Application Programming Interface, a way for different software to talk to each other) provide a real first step. Researchers can automate research workflows using AI agents for scientific discovery by FutureHouse, freeing them up for more complex thinking and experimentation.


Here are the 4 AI scientist agents released by FutureHouse:


  • Crow – Concise Search

    Need a quick, to-the-point answer based on scientific data? Crow is your agent. It's designed for specific questions and works well with direct API calls, drawing on a system called PaperQA2.

  • Falcon – Deep Search

    For more comprehensive tasks, Falcon steps in. It produces detailed long-form reports that pull from multiple sources like full-text articles and niche scientific databases, making it suitable for thorough literature reviews or when you need to assess a hypothesis carefully.

  • Owl – Precedent Search

    Quickly checks whether "anyone has done X before," narrowing duplication risk and guiding patent or grant strategy.

  • Phoenix – Chemistry Tasks

    Phoenix is an evolution of a previous tool called ChemCrow, which uses specialized cheminformatics tools to tackle chemistry-related problems with reasoning ability; it can sketch synthetic routes and propose new molecules.

  • Owl – Precedent Search

    Quickly checks whether "anyone has done X before." Owl, previously known as HasAnyone, helps researchers find out if specific scientific work has already been done before narrowing duplication risk and guiding patent or grant strategy.


The FutureHouse platform's four AI agents, Crow, Falcon, Owl, and Phoenix

Early performance


FutureHouse benchmarked Crow, Falcon, and Owl against leading large language model search tools and reported higher precision and accuracy than PhD-level biologists in head-to-head tests. These AI scientist agents also draw from full-text papers, not just abstracts, allowing them to flag methodology flaws or sample-size warnings that typical AI summarizers miss. They have shown performance in literature search tasks that surpasses human capabilities in benchmarks.


Phoenix is a different story. The team admits the chemistry agent "makes more mistakes" and is being released to see how the community breaks it. In short, it is a sandbox, not a lab-ready colleague.


Conclusion


FutureHouse's agents won't replace a PhD any time soon, but they can already shave days' worth of deskwork that surrounds every experiment. These AI assistants could allow human scientists to focus more of their energy on innovation and actual experimentation by handling some of the most time-consuming aspects of research, like comprehensive literature reviews and initial hypothesis vetting.


Crow, Falcon, Owl, and Phoenix are all visible steps toward that reality—a reminder that the next competitive edge may begin with a prompt rather than a pipette. The question is no longer if AI will become a staple in the lab, but how quickly we can adapt to make the most of its growing abilities.

Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 9.53.35 AM.png
bottom of page